mccain ain't able

well well well
mr. i'll be perfect
since the
keating five
mr. you can trust me
(i am not a crook, anyone?)
mr. i will win back your hearts
blah blah blah
is outed in the ny times
for having an affair
first, let me say
i'm sure
almost all do
but doesn't it seem
that over & over & over
the repugnican arseholes
in particular
stand up for
family values
then get caught
with their hands
in the cookie jar
so to speak
his vehement denial
means nothing to me
& probably
much much less
to his wife
before this latest
little embarassment
i already didn't trust him
because anyone who
has been to war
& been a POW
& seen
& done
& pondered
but still
outright supports
bushco's war machine
deserves what he gets
i'm just amazed
that the discussion
has turned to
the ny times
holding the story
(so?)
the ny times
being a liberal rag
(*snorting loudly*
'cause don't we
all
just
wish?)
the ny times
being wrong wrong wrong
um
whooooo's wrong?
look over there
look over there
there's nothing to see here